USE CASE 01
Report narratives
An officer's rough notes become a draft narrative, and the officer stays the author of record. The record shows exactly what the model was given and what it returned, ready for discovery.
Public safety
AI can draft the report. The record stands behind it.
Verillian decides what AI may do with criminal justice information on the device itself. It seals each captured turn into a record only your agency can open: the prompt, the draft, and the ruling.
End of shift
AI is already writing police reports.
A patrol officer comes off a double with five narratives still owed, and somewhere in that stack is the one a prosecutor will build a case on. A tool that turns rough notes into a clean draft in a minute is exactly the help they'd take. California has already said how this goes: SB 524 now requires a report drafted with AI to say so, and the agency to keep a record of it. The question lands on your desk either way. When the defense asks what the AI saw and what it wrote, your agency needs the answer on paper, not in anyone's memory.
On the job
The work AI takes off the shift.
Governed at the moment each tool acts, with identifiers screened before anything leaves the device and every step written down.
USE CASE 02
Case file summaries
A detective hands AI a hundred pages of statements and gets a working timeline in minutes, with every document the model was shown listed in the record.
USE CASE 03
The records unit
Records staff use AI to compile and prepare files for release, with your policy deciding what a tool may touch and each step landing in the trail.
The record
Chain of custody, extended to AI.
Your agency already knows how to handle evidence, and the record it keeps of AI work follows the same rules: sealed, in order, and able to show whether any line was altered.
Aligned to CJIS Security Policy v6.1
The controls line up with the current policy for handling criminal justice information: access controlled, actions attributable, activity logged on infrastructure your agency runs.
The whole turn, kept
Not just that AI was used, but what it was asked, what it was shown, what it answered, and what was refused. That's the level of detail a discovery motion actually demands.
Tamper-evidence a courtroom understands
Entries are chained so an altered line breaks the chain visibly. You don't ask a jury to trust the log; you show them it can be tested.
Nothing of yours reaches Verillian
The layer runs inside your own environment, and the prompts and the records stay there with it, which keeps the vendor section of a CJIS audit mercifully short.
Even record access gets recorded
When anyone opens the audit record, that access is sealed into its own chain, so the reviewer's reading becomes part of the evidence rather than a hole in it.
Rules per role, from patrol to analyst
A sworn officer writing a report, a civilian analyst working a case file, and a dispatcher each carry their own declared policy, applied the moment you set it. The separation between those roles holds at the machine too, not only in writing.
A halt every enrolled device obeys
One confirmed action stops governed AI on every enrolled device at once, and the stop writes itself into the record like anything else.
Aligned, not certified
What CJIS asks, and what courtrooms reward.
The FBI's CJIS Security Policy v6.1 governs how criminal justice information is accessed, moved, and accounted for. Verillian aligns with those controls and adds something the policy doesn't require but a defense attorney will test: a record sealed so that tampering shows.
CJIS Security Policy v6.1
criminal justice information
criminal justice information
California SB 524
AI-assisted reports
AI-assisted reports
Your agency answers the audit. Verillian hands you the controls and the sealed record to answer with.